Laserfiche WebLink
u <br />TO:Planning Commission Mt*mbers <br />Ron Moorsc. City Adn'inisirator <br />FROM:Michael P. Gaffron. Asst. Planning St Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:June 16, 1993 <br />SUB.IECT: #1832, Scott A. Mabusth, 740 North Brown Road - Variance - Public Hearing <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Survey <br />E - Statement of Hardships <br />F - Sketch of Proposed Shed Location <br />G - Topiagraphic Map <br />H - Picture of Shed to be Moved In <br />Pertinent Code Section <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D). No . . . accessory building shall be located nearer the <br />front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot . . . <br />Pertinent Facts <br />• Setback from street to existing house: 162.1’ <br />• Setback from street to«existing shed; 148’ <br />• Setback from street to proposed shed; 146’ <br />Discussion <br />The applicant proposes to replace an existing 8’xl6’ shed with a 10 xl6 shed. The <br />location slightly nearer the street than die residence requires a variance. <br />Please review the applicant ’s statement of hardships. Applicant indicates that topography <br />to the rear of the residence is steep. The obvious flat area just north of the house which would <br />meet code requirements is occupied by a wild flower garden. Moving the location further east <br />would place it in the drainageway that drains the drivewey area. <br />No trees need to be removed by replacing the shed in its current location. Your site <br />inspection will confirm that the property is heavily wooded. The natural woods and added <br />plantings through the decades make this a very seclud'*d site. The shed wili be screened trom <br />the road by existing evergreens so as to be not obtrusive and virtually invisible in all seasons. <br />I <br />iMtrr ri'