My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2023 4:18:00 PM
Creation date
10/26/2023 4:11:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:i- -:. .S <br />kL. <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 21, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1830 - CONT. <br />Mabusth noted that area where the boat is stored could be reduced <br />by half of the amount calculated to be removed. <br />Smith asked if the applicant has considered plantings or sod in <br />place of the rock area. <br />Oorlog said it does not flow with the neighbors’ property as well <br />and would require added maintenance. He noted that since the <br />Plastic was removed from the neighboring property, the owners just <br />use chemicals to kill the weeds, which flow into the Lake. <br />Chair Schroeder explained their goal is to get something to help <br />the Lake. <br />Peterson questioned the condition of the rip-rap. <br />Mabusth stated it was in good condition. She noted the plastic <br />under rock in the 0-75’ setback area. <br />Rowlette clarified that the Iower deck to be rep Iaced will be under <br />the addition. <br />Mabusth concurred, and added one-third of the lower deck is in the <br />0-75’ zone. <br />Rowlette said she would look more favorably on the lower deck if <br />the plastic were to be removed in the 0-75’ zone. <br />Lindquist asked the applicant if he would be agreeable to that <br />conditIon. <br />Oorlog stated if he has to remove it to gain approval. <br />Mabusth noted this condition is consistent with that placed on the <br />neighboring property. <br />Oorlog stated the plastic was not removed in the 0-75’ zone on his <br />neighbors’ property. He said he was wi I I ing to remove the hardcover <br />because he understood the purpose.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.