Laserfiche WebLink
/3 <br />TOj Pl4fM^ Conwiti!»»<w Nlcnihm <br />VUm Minjtie. Cut .Viministrtfpv <br />mOM;A MaHcth. Boiki^ & Z>Mm% <br />DATE:June 17. IW <br />SITBIECT: Kcimtth Fl«e. 20H Dnve Rc^uni h> Smy Iiwb Cc»vcn»«* <br />} .1 <br />IM Qt Exhibits <br />A ■ Ixxatiofi Klap <br />B - Ptat of Sy|^ W(Htd<i <br />C - Orifmat Surve> Pre^<aicii vnth BuiMum Pcrniil ApfUcatKia <br />D - R cvmc O Suncy \k;ili Aiacrkied Plan <br />E • SupptenKrtal Sheets w B»iiklinp Pcrmil AppikaiHUi fw <br />Sugar Woods Dorlotwrai HifWifht «>f Covenams Rcs|uircd by Cit> <br />F - Currem Dramage Pattern fot Profcrties 1 Ava^ at 21XX2 aoJ 21XM Sugaraood Dnve <br />G - Har dcover Fact Sheet <br />II • Packet of Support In^xinatioo Submitted by Applicani*! Comultam <br />Xomng nidfkl R lA Panned gesKkntial Dcveloprocni <br />IaH area - 53.421.559 s.f. or I 22b acres <br />Building cmxtope area - 19.483 23 s f (defined by 50’ front and rear setbacks and 40’ <br />side setbacks) <br />AIKmed hardcover ■» 15,586.b s.f. or <br />Proptised hardcover » 10.125 s.f. or 50% <br />Deicriptioa of Request <br />At the lime of the development of the plat of Sugar Woods, covenants governing the <br />development of each dte »crc dcvekiped by both City aisl applicant ’s attorney. Ihe City <br />c.vccuied the covenams in an attempt to rccntorce special comlitionji of plat approval The Sugar <br />W»xxls handout. Exhibit E. highlights some of those dcvciopinent conlrols. <br />The appiKam -vxkt the Planning Comniisskm to approve variances to these covenants. <br />The first involves a slight curvature of the driveway resulting from the need to save a mature <br />Review Exhibit C, the curved drive was shown on the original site plan submitted with <br />the building permit. The building sulf could not accept this plan for with the building permit <br />application because of the curve and asked for an amended site plan. Exhibit D. Applicant now <br />seeks approval of the Planning Commission