Laserfiche WebLink
2amm$ <br />hsm 17. IW <br />Pif* 2 <br />t I i 1stm <br />RcdMCtkMiof 120 4 » f. <br />• AJd 52 6t.f. 6iKfcrBadd!lii«. 23 * f Oe^. I« t f pnfr staO. 54 s.f bnumiftiia <br />dm • Rcsml 4AS • f oT NMiHiwm pavvit ia street y»d. <br />Ust^EiKlits <br />A * A^tcaUMl <br />B - Affilicani'f AddeniMB <br />C - l*ropefty Owatm Lw <br />D • Map <br />E-l-2 Hardcow Face <br />F - Synrey <br />G - llaidcowr Sat Han <br />If • Plan of Impiotrqncgti <br />I - Fkior Ptaa <br />I ♦ Nonh Btvatkifi <br />K • South Ek^aiwn <br />L • IPmpoied lafidscafs Area <br />M - hxioiiii I andtscayg Area <br />Dmriptkm of Rofiacsl <br />The pro|xacd in^vriaeab are locai-^ all out of the 0-75 ’ itcitwek ^fei. All additions <br />meet the required 10* side setback (gara«c at 50’ and kiteheo at 28 ’). Gndc-level steps arc <br />comidered noo-encroachments as lot^ as strutiure tneett the 10 ’ side setback. <br />Statement dt Hard^ip <br />Please review Exhibits A and B. Harddiips arc reviewed iv follows: <br />House was prkw to current zi’iiing standards and lakeshorc »tback requircmcnl.si. <br />The removal of some 448 s f. of bituminous drive will minimize negative impact of extensive <br />paved drive in Mreet yard. The comprehensive improvemem of the property will be consistent <br />with the improvements of existing resyences within the neighN>rhood. <br />Issues for CtHisiiteration <br />If Planning Commission members w ish to consider existing hardcover improvements for <br />iciroval. it may be necessary to waa to determine what final hardco er is in the 0-75 ’ scibsick <br />area In rev iewing the site plan. Exhibit G, the majority of hardcover improvements within Lhe <br />75-250’ setback zone arc either the residence stnarrure or the bituminous drive. Staff would rwt <br />recommend additional removals of the drive needed to prov^c adequate turnaround area and tfl- <br />strect parking.