My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2023 4:18:00 PM
Creation date
10/26/2023 4:11:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 21, 1993 <br />KENNETH FIGGE, 2004 SUGARWOOD DR - CONT. <br />Peterson stated this rriay help water move faster to the Gill <br />residence to the east. <br />Nolan felt if the filling were allowed, it may help to creating <br />ponding on the property to the west. <br />Mark stated the area to be filled is a pothole. <br />Nolan stated he would be more interested in a permanent solution. <br />Mark answered to make a gully through the trees to get to the swale <br />area, they need to fill this pothole. <br />Lindquist stated he is not comfortable with anything but a <br />permanent solution. <br />Mabusth noted the property owners/developers have indicated they <br />intend to seek approval of a conditional use permit in the near <br />future to implement a more comprehensive plan to solve the drainage <br />concerns. <br />Peterson polled the Commission and all were interested in a long~ <br />term solution. <br />Rowlette referred to the handout explaining the covenants to <br />builders. Condition #3 iefers to ‘‘landscaping structures", and she <br />stated they must define this term. She noted major discussion <br />during the PUD process in developing the covenants. <br />Mitchell stated no one dreamed that sidewalks would be prohibited <br />as the covenant is largely negative and it does not prohibit <br />sidewalks. He added most residences nave sidewalks to their front <br />door. <br />Nolan asked the builder if he would consider the removal of the <br />half circle shaped structure at the end of the sidewalk. He agreed <br />there is natural opening for the sidewalk and there appears to be <br />a need to provide a walk to the front door. <br />Mark stated the half circle structure was only provided for <br />aesthetics and ties in with the other development on the property. <br />He felt the walk fits in with the style of the home. <br />It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend <br />approval of the request from Kenneth Figge, 2004 Sugarwood Drive, <br />to install a 12’ wide curved arive. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />f
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.