My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
06-21-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2023 4:18:00 PM
Creation date
10/26/2023 4:11:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
% <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD JUNE 21, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1821 - CONT. <br />Ploetz replied the Wirtjes are the occupants of the existing <br />residence, but the fee holder of the property is the Wheaton <br />Company, of which Margo and Steve Wirtjes ere sole owners. <br />Lindquist inquired if it is important to stipulate that the well <br />be moved prior to final subdivision approval. <br />Mabusth felt it very important to establish a means to convey to <br />any future owner of the lot the condition that the well be moved <br />In the event that the alternate septic site is used. <br />Weckman added until the alternate site is used, the well Is not a <br />hinderance. He noted in the event the alternate site were to be <br />used, the City would be made aware through the permitting process. <br />Rowlette asked if the procedures for well permits has changed <br />recent Iy. <br />Mabusth explained that approximately 3 years ago the State Health <br />Department has assumed control over the permitting and inspection <br />of wells, and since they are a separate entity, are not required <br />to review or consent with the City on well locations. <br />Chair Schroeder noted it is not typical practice to make <br />move a well prior to final subdivision approval. <br />someone <br />Mabusth stated she had no problem with waiting to require the well <br />to be relocated until the alternate site is used, especially <br />considering the City has granted a setback variance for the well <br />to the existing septic system. She noted that the applicant was <br />aware of the City’s requirements for a 75’ setback prior to <br />development of the lot. <br />Ploetz stated the applicants prefer to wait to move the well due <br />to the additional cost. He rer-orted, to date, the applicants intend <br />to retain one of the lots for their residence. <br />Chair Schroeder asked if the applicants run their business out of <br />their home. <br />Ploetz replied the business is established in Wheaton Minnesota, <br />but they may use their home for some administrative work. The <br />applicants were originally from Wheaton. <br />'li <br />■■hLi <br />I*. i -k:!
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.