Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1837 <br />June 17, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - hardcover inventory. <br />75-250’ setback area = 2,240 s.f. <br />Existing = 432 s.f. or 19.28% <br />250-500’ setback area = 7,486.5 s.f. <br />Allowed = 2,245.95 s.f. or 30% <br />Existing = 3,132 s.f. or 41.83% <br />Proposed = 3,536 s.f. or 47.2% <br />Variance = 1,290.05 s.f. or 17.2% <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) <br />Total lot area = 9,727 s.l. <br />1,459 s.f. or 15% is allowed <br />1,533 s.f. or 15.7% exists <br />1,937.7 s.f. or 19.9% is proposed <br />List of Exhibits <br />Applicant proposes the installation of a 24 ’x32 ’ detached garage within the rear yard. <br />Current structure is located P/2’ from east lot line and 5.3’ from north lot line. Proposed <br />structure will be 2’ from the east lot line and 6’ from the rear at the northeast comer of the <br />strucnire. The accessory strncmre will be located only 6’ from the principal structure where the <br />code requires a minimum 10 ’ separation. The proposed garage is 768 s.f. and must be located <br />15 ’ from all lot lines. A structure less than 750 s.f. eap be placed 10 ’ from rear and side lot <br />lines. An excess of strucniral coverage exists on the pi petty. The improvement will result in <br />an increase of 4.2% structural coverage. Hardcover has been increased 5.4%. Applicant has <br />shown no compensatory hardcover removals. <br />At your site inspection determine if there will be any impact on the property to the <br />intmediate north. The strucnire will be at a maximum height of 12'/2 ’. There appears to be a <br />6-7’ high solid privacy fence along the rear of the property. Along the east side there is open <br />grassed" yard. The retaining wall along the lot line seems to be in a serious state of disrepair. <br />Applicant should advise as to the stanis of the strucnire. Is it to remain or is to be rebuilt? <br />The 24 ’ wide garage will require a 10 ’ wide cut into '.he existing 4 ’ bank. Applicant <br />must provide grading and drainage detail with building permit. The maximum 12 '/i high <br />structure will be place*! into the hill and may have limited visual impact on the property to the <br />north. Staff has received no comments from the neighbors notified of the improvement. <br />■ I I ■ IMP ■ III I