Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1S04 <br />March 11. 1993 <br />Pace 3 <br />support of the application. Staff has sketched the former Kearns residence on the survey <br />(Exhibit H). It was located to the rear o» the proposed residence and would have also been <br />Uxaied in front of the average lakcshorc setback. The Kearns residence was a single story <br />structure. The proposed residence viewed from the rear or southwest elevation will appear as <br />a single story structure. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Review Exhibit A. Applicant claims the walkout design ts ideal for the proposed sloping <br />topocraphic. The use of this site will minimize additional excavation and the need for retaining <br />wall? The proposed location of the stracmre will not require the removal of the mature trees <br />within the lakeshore yard. The propertv ’ exceeds the area and width requirements and requires <br />no other variance except for the average lakeshore setback variance. The former residence was <br />located in front of the average I?' shore setback line. If proposed house was moved behind <br />average lakeshore setback line, major excavations and retaining walls would be required. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. What view windows of a lakeshore structure are to be protected? Viewing windows <br />from the lakeshore side of structure or other? <br />2. Will the proposed strucmre impact the lakeshore views of the residence at 2684 <br />Casco Point Road? <br />■dUMiaa