Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORCNO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MARCH 15. 1993 <br />ZONING FILE 91298 - CONT. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval <br />of AppII cat ion 91298, a petition to vacate port ions of Forest Bivd, <br />for seven of the ten properties owners invoived with the <br />application, based on the findings presented. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />(92> ZONING AMENDMENT - SECTION 10.41, B-2 LAKE8H0RE BUSINESS <br />DISTRICT - INFORMATION MEETING 8:25 - 9:05 P.M. <br />Callahan stated the Council was not there to present their views <br />but rather to hear the Input from the Commission. He noted the <br />proposed ordinance assumes that current marina uses would be <br />allowed to continue until a requested change in marina or use. He <br />suggested they not consider attaching land use provisions to number <br />of slips allowed. He added the ordinance was not sent to the <br />Commission because of the need to amend, but merely to review and <br />consider amendments. <br />Gaffron reviewed that the City has licensed marinas since the <br />1960s. In 1985 the City considered the license ineffective and <br />considered approval of a conditional use permit instead, which was <br />not well received by marinas. In the past few years, It has become <br />clear that the City must recognize activities and changes on marina <br />propertIes. <br />Gaffron reviewed the three types of uses (permitted, conditional, <br />and accessory). He noted that the Comprehensive Plan suggests that <br />B-2 property should not be used solely to sail boats. He stated It <br />is hoped that over a period of time, the City will have the <br />mechanics to bring existing marinas Into better conformance. He <br />reviewed to the references to the LMCD code and that those <br />references may be outdated. <br />Callahan noted it is the Council’s Intent to remove any reference <br />to the LMCD ordinance from the code. <br />Jabbour noted that the LMCD has admitted they would have difficult <br />enforcing their ordI nance on dry stacking. <br />Callahan noted <br />actiV1t1es. <br />the LMCD does not have control over 1 and use <br />Jabbour asked that his comments not be meant to sway the <br />Commission’s recommendation, and explained the LMCD feels they have <br />the right to control the lakeshore through ramp activities. He felt <br />this to bo selective governing. <br />I