Laserfiche WebLink
Zooang File f ISOQ' <br />Fdmui}' 9, 1993 <br />Pige 2 <br />DisciIIJULlil <br />The primarv issues for this aiWi' iswn •« the recomminJed changes to the cxiMing <br />drains cMcnieiitt and ne^^ The City Engwers recomnKnd the <br />additioa of 95 acres 03 the exbling draiw^ casoneni. Isa^ on a 9?9 0 elevation ^hich ist«ld <br />chantc the dr> buildafck acreage to 10 6 acres m Lot A in order to restnet the use of a low <br />IviM area adiacem to the wetland boundary as defined by the normal water level. This casemem <br />U has a signincaot impact on the wetland. The curreia drainage and xmhxy <br />easoM must be vacated and a new one drawn to reflect the new prc^srity lines. <br />Ouiloi A must be divided trom Lot B and legallv combined with Lot A so that propefiv <br />is not landlocked and U reserved for ftmire develofwicnt This to line rcarrai^^ <br />Lot A with approximately 10.6 acres of dry bu.ldable land, <br />ia the future In order to provide access to this prrpciry. we feel th*t Outto A should be <br />iiKorporaied with Lot A and an ctscmcni granted for access to Lot B. This wouU <br />l^^Tlforto addttional lot. At the time this property b aibdivided, the boundaries for Quito <br />A should also he changed to include the actual nad providing access to Lot B. <br />Staff would recommend aRirov^ of aibdivision application #1^ provided U» drainage <br />and utility easements are amended as noted above and ownership of OuUot A is <br />Lot A with an casement granted providing access to L*« B. The vacaiioo o rainage <br />cascroents may be completed at the time of a future subdivision. <br />■i ^ <br />*■ •>