Laserfiche WebLink
Carter Delaittre <br />February 19» 1991 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />In reviewing the staff s«moa and Planning Coanission/Council <br />Minutes I think you %#ill find that Snedberg was less than <br />cooperative in allowing the subdivision to be c<»pltted. <br />n^her Planning Coswission nor Council objected to the division, <br />Seedberg requested and was granted a tabling of the request for • <br />s^onths so he could -research his option.* for use of hi. <br />property. This attitude resulted from one Jf? <br />subdivision resolution which would require <br />the parcels within each individual record lot. The <br />was tabled on March 25, 1985 and has never been rescheduled for <br />action. Apparently, Nelson and McCloud were able to close on <br />their transaction absent City subdivision approval, and "O"* <br />the Involved parties have pushed for completion of this <br />application since that tine. <br />I .hould not. that Mr. McCloud did r.turn .n.cut.d <br />*.uto».tie lot area ..rlanc* r.aolution. tony •’“*1 <br />28, 1985. Because the subdivision has never been finallred, the <br />automatic lot are. variance forms have never been finalized, <br />which means that technically no permits can be <br />property until a lot area variance is granted and the subdivision <br />is resolved. <br />My reconuaendation to you is as followsi <br />1. AS part of your after-the-fact variance request, you <br />should request City approval of <br />variance resolution, which action was stalled cut In 1985. <br />2. Mr. McCloud and the current owner of Record Lot 16 <br />should jointly request reopening of the tabled subdivision <br />application #889, to be reviewed concurrently with the <br />variance request. For the record. Record Lot 16 also has <br />never been granted the autcmatic lot area variance. <br />Also, be aware that Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.31, <br />Subdivision 6 (B) disallows issuance of buxldlng “^iVr^ <br />the lots have been legally combined for tax P“^P®»®*! <br />Section 10.31, Subdivision 12 iD) <br />dwellinqs over 800 s.f. of floor area be provided with a fuiiy <br />conforming on-site sewage , J*b “®”r*dicated <br />after-the-fact permit for the room additions will P <br />on these requirements being met.