My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2023
>
10-23-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2023 10:30:57 AM
Creation date
10/24/2023 10:22:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 7417 <br />VARIANCE ANALYSIS: <br />B1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br />and intent of the ordinance ...." The proposed variances are in harmony with the <br />purpose of the Ordinance. The Property has difficulties in its substandard size and width, <br />the proximity to the channel, the 75-foot lake setback, the existing home location, and the <br />floodplain areas of the property making development difficult. <br />B2. "Variances shall only be permitted ... when the variances are consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan." The variances proposed to rebuild a new home in the same <br />footprint on this nonconforming lot are consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />B3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br />practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in <br />connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to <br />permit construction of a new residence on the existing foundation on the <br />substandard lot is reasonable. <br />b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. The substandard lot size is an existing condition, there is no <br />available land with which to make the Property more conforming. The existing <br />conditions, lot size, and location are challenges not created by the Owners. There <br />should be consideration for variances for the Property which is substandard in area <br />and setback requirements. The project has been designed with an effort toward <br />limiting the additional hardcover without sacrificing functionality; and <br />c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The <br />variances are requested in order to permit construction of a new home in the same <br />footprint, which is reasonable. Hardcover and setback improvements are being <br />made. <br />B4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />B5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78." This condition is not applicable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.