Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM <br />Item No.: 16 <br />Date: October 9, 2023 <br />Item Description: #LA23-000046, Rebecca Holzem, 3407 Eastlake Street Variance <br />Presenter: Natalie Nye Agenda Community <br />Planner Section: Development Report <br />1. Purpose. This application is regarding variances for average lakeshore setback, 75-foot lake <br />setback, overall hardcover and hardcover within the 75-foot lake setback for the construction on a new <br />deck. <br />2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received August 15, 2023 and considered to <br />be complete on September 5, 2023. Therefore the 60-Day review period expires on November 4, 2023. <br />3. Background/ Summary. The applicant is proposing to construct a new, 280 square foot deck on the <br />property. The subject property is substandard in size and width for the LR-IA district with a total of 4,488 <br />square feet when 2 acres is the minimum required. The property is considered a lake lot due to the OHWL <br />being present on the property. There is no outdoor living space present on the property today. The <br />existing home is within the 75-foot setback and was approved in 2005 with variances through Resolution <br />5222. The proposed deck would be located within the 75-foot setback, within the average lakeshore <br />setback and brings the overall hardcover on the site from 27% to 35%. The applicant has listed the <br />extremely small lot size and lack of outdoor space as practical difficulties. <br />4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On September 18, 2023, the Planning Commission held <br />a public hearing. A member of the public spoke in favor of the request. The Commission reviewed the <br />application and noted the proposed project is not out of character for the neighborhood and believed the <br />property had practical difficulties due to the small lot size and unique placement near the lake. The <br />Planning Commission discussed the size of the deck and questioned if the size was necessary and <br />referenced the original 2005 approval. The Commission had a split vote recommended approval of the <br />application as applied by a vote of 4 to 2. Video of the Planning Commission meeting is at available on <br />the city website to refence the discussion. <br />5. Public Comment. The applicant has provided neighbor acknowledgment forms. <br />6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends denial of the application as applied. The original <br />approval of variances for the home (Resolution 5222) specifically state that a deck was forgone from the <br />design of the home in order to minimize the hardcover request. It went on to say that future hardcover <br />increases would likely not be supported. The homeowner has reasonable use of the property with a single- <br />family home. Staff recognizes the practical difficulties of the substandard site, but staff does not believe <br />the requested deck size is necessary especially without any other reduction of hardcover on the site. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Direct staff to draft a denial resolution. <br />Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Proposed Plans <br />Exhibit B. PC Staff Report 9/18/2023 <br />Prepared By: NAN <br />Reviewed By: LLO <br />Approved By: <br />