11-21-1994 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' ? M Zonin;' File -91981 November 17. 1994 Pauc 2 I - Bluff and Bluff Impact Zorers Defined in Revieu of Application #1911 J - Map of Stakes Placed on Property by Applicant for City ’s Convenience at Site Inspection K1-3 -Floor Plans LI - Site Plan Locating Access Stair Deck for Plan B (Note Not to Scale) 1,2 - Survey for Plan B Improvements Ml - Site Han LiKating Accessory Structures for Plan A • (Note Not to Scale) M2 - Survey for Plan A Improvements N - Footprint of Residence 01-2 - Elevations P - Survev Description of Request The applicant was present during the review ot variance application #1911 that granted the area variance for the undeveloped lot of the recent lot line rearrangement (Lemmerman application). During that review the legal building envelope was defined as shown on Exhibit I. The Council in their approval of the application, directed that this site plan Kvating the legal envelope be included as part of the formal resolution. Applicant has provided two plans for development. Plan A proposes approval ot a street setback vanance allowing structure to be moved further away from the blutf impact zone. Proposal B shows structure "meeting the 35 ’ setback but major portions of the northeast comer of the residence are lixrated within the actual blutf area, refer to Exhibit L-2. Review Exhibits M-1 and M-2, structure although located 25 ’ from the street lot line will actually be placed 46’ from the traveled rtud. Note this placement of the structure w’ould allow the deck and stair to be moved into the approved building envelope at the nonhwest comer. Proposal B although meeting the street setback involves major encroachment of the bluff and the bluff impact zone. As it was difficult for staff to determine lot lines and placement of house on property, the applicant was asked to stake the lot line and building envelope for proposal A for your inspection (Exhibit J). Applicant has also provided a map locating adjacent residences to determine any visual impact, specifically, on adjacent residence to the west, review Exhibit E. In reviewing the elevations and the tloor plans, you will note that applicant has reversed placement of garage. Garage will be at the east side of simcture. The rear elevation sketch by applicant provides the correct elevation. Applicant w ill bring revised elevation sketches to our meeting. .^-!j v«-j> .