Laserfiche WebLink
Zoninz Flic #1980 <br />Ncrv ember 15. <br />Pa^ : <br />P«lt neichbothDoJ. In f«:« propenies to the imiDediate v«th and immediate west are all at <br />:5.ooo s'.f. <br />Review FAhihil K. .ewer is avtulahle at Kwh the east and west sides of pt^^eny. A >e»^ <br />ctmnectHtn can be made at either of the stubs A sewer unit has alretwly heen pakl tor the <br />property. E^h of the srparaic fiMjr lots was chargal a quaner unit. <br />Review Exhibits E and G. Gusufson reatfirms that draLnagc flows predominately to tbs cast, <br />lie perccisTS no impact on adjacent residence. <br />The propeiiv is htwinded by Tonkawa R.-ad on the east side and Park Avenue on the west and <br />is defined ai a through lof. Applicant and future owner should be adviad thtt the etKie will <br />require a conditional use lor construction of accessor) stnicmrcs. <br />Gustafson’s report. Exhibit G. aduses that the approval of this site for develop^m <br />in three residential units being sersed by the unimproved publn: righl*of-wa>. He calls tor <br />development of a public road at a 24’ width with a turn around at the north end. This will Ik <br />a difficult feat since the City only has a 30’ right-of-way for Park Amrnc. Staff would <br />recommend that applicant be responsible for continuing the paved road at the present width and <br />providina a turn around or loop driveway using portions o! the 50’ public nght-ol-way. <br />Applicam shall include the turn around w ith the final plan for development of the site review <br />bv the City Engineer. Applicant has discussed the potential of achieving ac^-ss ott <br />based on the final location of the house on the site. If is doubtful whether tfu: County will a ow <br />a new curb cut at the Countv road when other access \< available. The engineer has also asked <br />for the granting of drainace and utility easements akmg the boundaries of the propeny and <br />additional richt-of-way for the County road. Ihe City does not request drainage and utility <br />casements or“require the granting of right-of-way when reviewing variances. Such requests are <br />valid during subdivision reviews. <br />\s applicant has presented this application without a final development plan, approval of the <br />variances must be based on future development meeting required setbacks ol the LR-IB zoning <br />district and for the through lot as follows; <br />35’ setback for Park Avenue <br />35’ setback from Tonkawa (County Road 135) <br />10’ side. <br />The property is IcKaied within 500-1.000’ of lakeshore and is allowed 35S^c hardcover. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />A. Is the proposed building site consistent with the historic and current pattern of <br />development of the Minnetonka Summit Park ncighlxirhtwxl?