Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />V <br />TO:Chair Schrocdcr and Oroix^ Planning Commiision Nlembcrs <br />Ron Moor?c, City Adrninistraior <br />FROM; Jeanne A. Mabusth. Building & Zoning Adminhiraior <br />DATE:November 15. 199^ <br />SLBJECT: #1979 Ridu.u Little. 1890 Shady\*(xxl Road - Variances - I^iblic He.iring <br />Zoning District: LR-IC requiring 21.780 s.f. or 1/2 acre in area. <br />Total area of property » 38.233 s.l. <br />Pertinent Ordinances <br />Section 10.03. Subd. 14(C) - Review of siructural coverage. <br />Allowed = 5.735 s.f. or 15 <br />Existing = 3.907 s.f. or 10.2% <br />Propos^ « 3.907 s.f. or 10.2% if the deck is replaced in its present dimensions (lot <br />coverage facts wtxild not be altered if expanded deck is approved as deck would not have <br />railings). <br />Sectit»n 10.22. Subd. 1(A) - Lakeshore setback variance (review Exhibit O). <br />Required = 15' <br />Existing =71 ’ <br />Proposed » 71 ’ if deck is approved in present configuntion <br />Proposed = 65 ’ if expanded deck area is approved refe r to Exiubit J. <br />Section 10.22, Subd. KB) - Average lakeshore setback variance (review Exhibits N and O). <br />The entire I4 ’x26 ’ deck would be located in front of the average lakeshore setback line. <br />Section 10.22. Subd. 2 - Review f f’ lrdcover variances. <br />A. 0-75 ’setback area «' li 250 s.f. <br />Existing =' .i.r s.f. or 0.1% <br />Proposed = 11.9 s.f. or 0.1 % if deck approved in its present configuration <br />Proposed = 271.9 s.f. or 2.4% if expanded deck is approved <br />Increase in hardcover = 260 s.f. or 2.3% <br />B.75-250 ’ setback area = 26.983 s.f. <br />Allowed = 6.745.7 s.f. or 25% <br />Existing = 8.056 s.f. or 29.8% <br />Piopo.scd = 8,056 s.f. or 29.8% if deck approved in its present <br />configuration <br />Proposed = 8.225.9 s.f or 30.5% if expanded deck area is approved <br />Hardcover increase = 169.9 s.f. or 0.6%.