Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />^V^S c E . PCBUC IIE,\.R1NG 9:15 P.M. - 9:55 P.M.3855 CHERRV AM^NX"E <br />The .^i^vn of P. T3i:ci: end C--:1:t:03!e o: MiilidS <br />Mr. and Mrs. Steve Engiund were preserii. <br />1^, viri-i-'t for determinins the buildabiiity of a lot that is <br />Gaffroa ‘ ^ acre. .Although several relatives own neighboring <br />0.37 acre. The Zoning Cu meets that sundard. Some <br />parcels, no \ drainage culvert was uisalled in consultation with <br />drainage improvements **a^c ^Cwn .. • ■ xvd^'^on orocerTV. There are -nature trees <br />the Public Works according to the maps. The prepertv is in the <br />on the propern and it is . hardcover is allowed. The ccncepnial proposal would .-lot <br />:50-5C0- turclccvcr zon. wr.«e T^e propc:z>- has b«n <br />be a problem on this lot. No necessars- <br />m “rat ‘”l5l^'imtvemge lot sizes var>- m me ne.zhbcrhood and th,s lot is no. <br />'iiconsistenc with the area. <br />l.,ndo,.st ashed why f <br />to be sure the lot was buildabie berorv .nL^mn^ aic ^ <br />smith asked how much fill w.nid be required because of die steep bank from the street to th.e <br />proposed home site. <br />Englund suted he hoped to move as few ."TLme bl^rn^y <br />be ni^ts^r-!'’ that fitirqulred would he approsima.ely 5-6 ’ in heieht. <br />neighbor questioned whai was being <br />prob'ems in this area. Engiund coniirraed m dmined as a result of the culvert <br />He noted an e.xcessive amount of waier m the spring that had dramed <br />installation. <br />C.afftcn explained Ihere would be a <br />but likely none under the house. If tUl comes in piece • brought in at the time of house <br />a condiuorui use permit would be required If ^ <br />consmicaon. it can be brought in as pan of the building permit. <br />Smith asked if how the fill was brought in could affect the drainage. Gaffr^respon <br />grading plan would be required before any fill was brought onto the prop ny. <br />12 <br />■i <br />j