Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />i'. <br />TO:Cluir Siihroebcr and Orooo Plarmii^ Oxnmhskm Mcrobcrk <br />Rem Moorsc. City AdminhtTJtor <br />rRtBI:Mklael P. Gaffhm. Assl. (*Umtng & Zoning Adminisiraior <br />DATE:Oc^o^er 10, I9Q4 <br />Sl'BJKtT: #1959 James Oglarsl. 3345 Cnsul Bay Road - Variance - Coot inuatKm <br />Public Heanng <br />Li^ of Exhibits <br />A - Lciier fnmi Appiicam <br />B - Staff Sketch <br />C - N«Micc of Ptannii^ Comirission Action 9 22/94 <br />D Planning: Commission Miraitcs 9/19/94 <br />E - Memo and Exhibits of 9/13/94 <br />Discuvsiun <br />Applicant has discussed his rcasonabte options, with stall and has concluded that the slwd can <br />be relocated within the property IxHindarics. thereby eliminating the enen^'hments onu> Hillside <br />Place right-of-way and Dakou Rail right-of-way. <br />He is requesting that the shed be allowed up u> but m*t over the side and rear lot lirars. in etfcct <br />a "zero setback". This will allow a large tree between the shed and the house to be preserved, <br />and will leave a 10’ scibKk between the htnise and the shed. <br />The applicant’s proposal appears to be a viable solution to the cncro.n;hnienl problems Ihe <br />variances necessary to approve the shed in this location include. <br />1. Rear yard setback variance of 5’ (5’ required). <br />Side yard setback variance of 10’ (10’ required). <br />3.Lot coverage variance (lot coverage including shed is 1.085 s.f. or 19.1%; 15% <br />or 1.500 s f. allowed). <br />Hardcover in 75-250 ’ zone of approximately 50% (25% allowed) <br />Staff Recommcndalio' <br />If Planning Commission rveommends approval of the variances required tor this sh^ location, <br />staff r«ommends that the applicant provide a complete hardcover mventory for the property <br />prior to Council review.