Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Zoning File #1973 <br />October 11. 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />report on her comments She uiHiU have no problem with the garage as pr^>p.>scd and wvxiIJ <br />appro\^ the setback of 15* ± Staff and Strauss concur that we winild not want to sec an> <br />encroachment of the 75* setback area ni>r the bluff and rrci'mmend that if a deck is to be <br />installed at the lakeside of hcHise that it be placed at the stsutheast comer behind the /5 setback <br />and the 970 elevation. of bluff, requiring approval of a skIc setback \anancc. ITie LR-IA <br />Zoning District requires a 30* side setback The deck will also be able to provide a stable <br />structure for connection to the lakeshore access stair. Note also the location of a mature tree <br />that would be lost if deck ha? to extend along front of residence. <br />Upon your inspection of the property mne that at the souihcaM c*'rncr there appears to be an <br />existing three season porch that could be renovated w ith a new deck contKcted at the southeast <br />coriKr of the resideiK'e. Staff asked Strauss to confinii what DNR prefers in the way of erosion <br />control when wi^rk is conducted within the bluff impact rone. She preters silt fencing rather <br />than staked hay bales as staked hay bales are mvt durable when coastruction extends beyond two <br />weeks <br />Al.so review area or elevatii'n? at the kvation of the new garage. Staff will a^k ft>r detailed <br />grading arai drainage plans for the City tngineer's review. Should these plans be submitted w iih <br />the building permit application or prior to Council s formal action; <br />Review Exhibits J and K, Weekman notes that the propi>sed improvements will not hinder the <br />liH:aiing of future septic site on this property as there really is no other viable area for septic <br />needs. ^The only option for applicant will be either a holding tank or a limited septic area to the <br />northeast of the house if the well is relvKated on the site. As Weekman also iH>ies. this <br />neighborhood is an area currenily being reviewed by the City for potential sewering in the <br />future. <br />Statenien! of Hardship <br />Review Exhibit A, staff would add extreme steeped topographies. A third acre lot being <br />.subjected to 2 acre zoning standards. The house is currently not served by a deck and there are <br />signs of erosion at the top of the bank at the southeast comer where a make-shift patio area is <br />in use. The cxi-sting single stall garage is in a serious state of disrepair and not able to be used <br />for parking purptises. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1.Would you approve a lakeside deck that was located out of the 75* setback area and out <br />of the Muff.’ What kind of setback variance would you grant at the east side lot line and <br />bow much hardcover increase would you allow w ithin the 75-250 setback area currently <br />proposed at 33.8 /t?