Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Zoning I'ile #1972 <br />October 10, 1994 <br />Pace 2 <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant proposes installation of a 12’xl6’4" three season porch to the street or north side of <br />existing rcMdencc The existing stoop and stair arc Uxated 25 ” from street lot line. The <br />proposird three season porch would be 18*. The h^nise to the east is legated slightly behind tront <br />line of existing residence and is 10’ iwm the shared lot line. The residence to the west is m <br />line with the front line of the subject structure. Applicant s residence is 14* + from west lot line <br />and the proposed addition will be 22’. The mature evergreen in the street yard will not be lost <br />as a result of the construction. <br />The residerere has been vacant for over nine years. The current owner and applicant is a retired <br />contractor and has slowly worked on the renovation of the structure over the summer months. <br />Staff met with the applicant on site and discussed the issue ot tuture olf street parking as <br />residence is not served by a drivewav nor off street parking area. Note there is 610 s.f. of <br />available hardcover and there is adequate width w ithin the west side yard to allow a minimum <br />width driveway to rear yard. Applicant did discuss his plans for a future garage to the rear yard <br />located out of'the hardcover zone (review Exhibit E) but note structural coverage tacts ateve, <br />applicant is already at ll.S^t with proposed improvements with only an additional 297 s.f. <br />allowed for additional sta'Ctural coverage. If a garage was to be in.stalled on this property, a <br />structural coverage variance would be required. <br />Review Exhibit G. note change in nx>f line at northwest comer of residence. The variance need <br />not be addressed for this expansion a.> intensification of roof structure will occur within <br />conforming street and side setbacks. <br />Statement of Hardship <br />Review E.xhibit A, applicant notes minimal living space and enhancement ot stmeture <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Would proposed improvement be consistent with development within Lmmcdiate <br />neighborhood? <br />2.Can three season porch be UKated so as to conform to setback standards, rcter to <br />Exhibits E and F? <br />3.As it is the intention of applicant to install a future garage, should applicant be advised <br />to amend current application to include future garage that would require a lot coverage <br />variance <br />J