10-17-1994 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning Flic #1967 September 15. 1994 Page 2 e\aluation process. Since the Olson propeny currently has a tailing septic system, the primary site will he used immediately and the alternate site would remain for potential future use. Lot Standards for K.tisting Residence Please review the proposed single lot divisi »n. Exhibit G In the narrow ci'ntext of a single lot subdivision. thi.s lot would require a number of variances to lot standards, i e.: Only 187’ of frontage on Hayside Road. - A 30' setback from the proposed south lot line which would be considered as a rear lot line, hut which becomes a side lot line in the context of the larger subdivision. Clearly, this 1-lot division only mokes sense in the context of the full multi-lot subdivision Proposed Outlot A Again, in the context of the single lot subdivision, the layout of Outlot A would be illogical However, it fits together in the context of the complete proposal. If Lot 1 is split off from the remainder of the Olson parcel as proposed, and Outlot A is created, what is the down side to the City if the future subdivision for some reason is never completed?. In creating Outlot A. with the very narrow neck at the southeast cor.-'er ot »he Gettre property and leaving 150’ of frontage on Hayside Road, the outlot would not be contorming in lot width as an iralividual building site. It w\>uld certainly be appropriate that the City place specific restrictions on Outlot A, as follows; 1. Outlot A is created merely for future development, and shall not be used for single family residential purposes until a future plat has been approved by the City. 2. Park dedication f.es will be due when Outlot A is platted for future development. 3. Any future platting of Outlot A that does not include the Geffre pn'perty must include the Olson property (Lot 1) to result in the Olson property becoming confomiing to the lot width, area and setback standards of the RR-IB Zoning District. Proposed Future Access I.ocatiun It is the developer ’s intent that a new private road be developed with the future plat, accessing Bayside Road either at ihe Olson ’s current driveway kKatii>n or to the immediate west ot the Geffre property (see Exhibit F). Applicant is requested to sul nil written continuation from Hennepin County DOT that the current driveway location would be an acceptable road access location.