My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
10-17-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 3:57:44 PM
Creation date
10/19/2023 3:20:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
415
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r 1 <br />Mr. Dak Gustafson <br />October 11, 1994 <br />Page 4 <br />partkle size of 2" and no more than 50% material finer than a #4 sieve or 3% finer tfun a #200 <br />sieve. This type of material is free draining, exhibits very little shifting when frozen, and is <br />easier to compact in confined spaces siKih as expected at this project site. We recommend <br />placmg tfK granular fill in lifts no more than 6’m thickness with vibratory compactic,i of each <br />lift. Care should be taken m choosing compacuen equ.pmem which has sufficient energy for <br />effective compaction yet does not have e.xcessive energ>' or weight to cause significant shiftmg <br />of the wall facing stones dunng the gnvcl compaction process. A porous gcotcxulc separauon <br />fabric is recommended to separate the pravel fill from fine gramed native soils at surfaces where <br />seepage from the soil iiuo the gravel can be c.xpectcd. This includes beneath the topsoil layer <br />placed over the gravel. <br />Our computations iiKlicatc the critical, or governing, factor for wall stability is lateral sliding <br />of the retaining wall base. In order to attain the minimum recommended factor of safet>’, we <br />recommend the following minimum depth (distance back from the back of the tacing stone) of <br />g**'grid-reinforced gravel. <br />WaU Hdglit (ft.) <br />Depth of Reinforced Backfill Zone (ft.) <br />Level Slo|X! <br />Behind Wall <br />2.5:1 .Ma.\imum <br />Slope Behind Wall <br />•>2.6 3 4 <br />4 4.5 6.8 <br />6 6.8 10 I <br />S S.9 - <br />For wall heights between those listed above, you f\ interpolate in direct proportion to arrive <br />at minimum reinforced backfill zone depths. <br />We recommend using a geogrid at least equal ■*' the specifications of Tensar UX1500 (SR-2) <br />uniaxial material for slope reinforcement. For at least some fastemng of the face stone to the <br />reinforced backfill, we recommend extending tlie geoprid 8" to 9" into the stone course joints <br />at the geogrid layer level. You should realize this connection relies only on the frictional <br />resistance of movement between the stone and geogrid material. Thus, care should be taken <br />when moving equipment or heavy objects near the facing stone, so the stoiK is not shifted or <br />damaged.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.