Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />m Bonestroo <br />Rosene <br />Andeiiik& <br />Associates <br />Engineers A Architects <br />September V. 19<M <br />ATV nr f jr A*i’-wrvr cixi''*1-'^IT <br />Oa» G -r» ®f <br />^ • <br />C ^ <br />i. tervM m <br />f n <br />t Cu«L« « <br />t Scopes n <br />O ^ <br />kMnM <br />Conv,«jet <br />^ wrikfii n <br />• jtw- n <br />«w«t t ^ <br />n*'«« * nrwf n <br />rjMfl O ^'«eu n <br />• ete^ : #wiie« ^ • <br />je"» ^ Suw*attrt ^ <br />Mere • *4er>s0rt n <br />^ •eof»»^jnr* Pf <br />vi « fma n <br />t Ar^af-vjn ^ • <br />OortMt c jh^jua. <br />% w%a n <br />j Siyrtipi^ n <br />• tiu ^ <br />\|TVi^ M t-^ • C ^ <br />Jt ^ <br />V n <br />• tupjrv n <br />le^ C “ n <br />ki« - n <br />• ^'X»^pr n•ennr <br />Vl^ t MV <br />VMrv * k»V! n <br />A vtor^ n <br />►jul i 1 j<^''»xw' • ‘ ^ <br />- f Jljp^v' <br />immm n <br />vir« r *n>% n <br />n <br />I e*« 4> . Sk^ n <br />A «—•! <br />e • «3m •€ <br />1^ f 1M n <br />. tme ^ <br />o n <br />CnM0 enr^ ^ <br />f^ G Heue* ^ <br />jeew* ^ Gunp* ^ <br />C*»jr^ • fnenon <br />teo M <br />Mjri^r V Olt*' <br />^ vs ^ |->|P^SJA» <br />Mr. Michael P. Gaffron. <br />Asst. Building and Zifling Administrator <br />City t>f Orono <br />Pom Office Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 <br />Rc: K-P Propcrtic.s <br />File No. 139-1967 <br />Dear Mike. <br />We have reviewed the preliminary plat and grading plan submitted by K-P Properties. Inc. for <br />Bay-view Farms 2nd Addition. The property is Uvated st>uth of Bayside Road (County Road <br />No. 84) and east of C.S.A.H. No. 19 in the northwest quarter of Section 6. The proposed access <br />l( vation on Bayside Road appear to be adequate, himcver. Hennepin County should review the <br />plans. Ibe platting of a future connection to the adjacent property to the south and west i.s <br />appropriate. The horizontal street alignments arc acceptable. The vertical curves alignments <br />do not appear to meet a 30 MPH design speed as required by City Ctxle. Ihc minimum <br />acceptable length for each of the three vertical curves arc 160, 110 and 180 respectively, <br />starting at the north and moving sriuth. A typical section for the proposed street should be <br />submitted that shows a minimum paved width of 28 feet and a section of 8-inches of class 5. <br />lOO*:^ crushed aggregate base and 3-inches of bituminous pavement. <br />'Ihc grading plan seems to indicate that an urban section roadway is proposed. If ifiat is the <br />case, a drainage pUin should be submitted to address the runoff. If a rural section roadway is <br />pro|X)sed. the ditches should be at least 2-feet below the edge of the roadway. <br />Tlie grading plan does not .shviw grading of the cul-de-sac nor d(KS It address drainage patterns <br />or erosion control. Silt fence should be installed ak'ng the wetland areas prior to construction. <br />Drainage easements should be shown on any wetland areas and along any proposed drain.igc. <br />routes. The plans should be submitted for review by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Di.strict. <br />Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. <br />Yours very trulv. <br />BONCSTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />/Jl <br />Shawn D. Gustafson. P.E. <br />2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600