Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Zoning File #1967 <br />September 15, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />oaluation process. Since the Olson propem currently has a failing septic system, the primary <br />site will be used immediately and tlK alternate site would remain for ptncntial funirc use. <br />Lot Standards for Existing Residence <br />Please review the proposed single lot division. Exhibit G. In the narrow contc.xt of a single lot <br />subdivision, this lot would require a number of variances to lot staiKlards, i.c.: <br />- Only 187’ of fronuge on Bayside Road. <br />- A 30 ’ setback from^he proposed south lot line which would be considered as a rear <br />lot line, but which becomes a side lot liiw in the context of the larger subdivision. <br />Clearly, this I-lot division only makes sense in the context of the full multi-lot subdivision. <br />Proposed Outlot A <br />Again, in the context of the single lot subdivision, the layout of Outlot A would be illogical. <br />However, it fits together in the context of the complete proposal. <br />If iMt 1 is split off from the rc ainder of the Olson parcel as proposed, and Outlot A is created, <br />what is the down side to the City if the future subdivision for sot. reason is never completed.'. <br />In creating Outlot A, with the very narrow neck at the southeast comer of the Geffre property <br />and leaving 150’ of frontage on Bayside Road, the outlot would not be confonning in lot width <br />as an individual building site. It would certainly be appropriate that the City place specitic <br />restrictions on Outlot A, as follows: <br />1 Outlot A is created merely for future development, and shall not be used for single <br />family residential purposes until a future plat has been approved by the City. <br />2. Park dedication fees will be due when Outlot A is platted for future development. <br />3 Any future planing of Outlot A that does not include the Geffre property must include <br />the'oison property (Lot 1) to result in the Olson property becoming conforming to <br />the lot width, area and setback standards of the RR-IB Zoning District. <br />Proposed Future Access Location <br />It is the developer ’s intent that a new private road be developed with the fumre plat, accessing <br />Bayside Road either at the Olson ’s current driveway location or to the immediate west of the <br />Geffre property (see Exhibit F). Applicant is requested to submit written cont.rmation from <br />Hennepin County DOT that the current driveway locauon would be an acceptable road access <br />location.