Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MfNXTES OF THE OROXO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 15, 1994 <br />ZONING FILE #1941 - CONT. <br />It was moved bv Peterson, seconded by Lindquist, to recommend approval of Application #1941 <br />for URov and'wanda Fischbach. 3135 North Shore Drive, for the vananccs as proposed and <br />accepted the hardships stated by applicants, subject to the following conditions: applicants must <br />provide an updated survey, all hardcover removals must be completed prior to tooti^ <br />inspection, erosion controls must be placed along the pond, and mature evergreen trees must be <br />repbnted. Smith asked that a minimum size be designated for replacement trees. Gaftron <br />indicated that could be done and also suggested that the trees be identilicd tor removal. . Ir. <br />Fischbach inquired what needed to be done regarding erosion control. Gaftron explained it <br />would be necessary to install a silt fence during construction. Smith suggested a land^a^ plan <br />and planting schedule be provided. Peterson noted the proposed motion is based <br />tores computed to be in the 44.000 s.f. range. Gaftron said he would meet with Fischbach s <br />architect before sending the application to Council. Chair Schroeder indicated approva is asc <br />on structural coverage being 15% or less of the total lot area. Ayes 4, nays 0. <br />(#4) #1944 BRADLEY AND DINA ETHERINGTON. 4055 ELM STREET - RpEWAL <br />V ARI^VC^ - CONTINTJATION OF PUBLIC HEARING - 7:17 TO 7:35 <br />Bradley and Dina Etherington and Mark Fuller, realtor were present. <br />Gaffron explained the application had previously been tabled to allow applicants additional time <br />"de ^ u^^ suLy and to have lot lines staked. All requirements are met other than <br />lot area for a single family building site. <br />Chair Schroeder asked whether there was public interest. <br />I^nce Wile, 615 Minnetonka Highlands Une e.xpressed concern with a possible dispute over <br />encroachment of a lot line. Chair Schroeder inquired about the location of the lot me. <br />Etherington stated the survey was properly done. <br />lleman and Shirley Laue. 594 P.,rk Une. alaled ihey have hyed “ <br />Some of ihe orieinal pipes marking the lot lines are still m place, fhe recent survey does not <br />cZe do e wLn he constructed a shed on his property, he made sure tt w.|h.n h.s pro^rty <br />h^Lat^s He noted the property to die east had been surveyed vvhjch me. his c^in^r . . <br />Chair Schroeder asked if he would dispute the cuneni survey. Mr. Uue answered <br />affirmative. <br />1