My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
09-19-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 3:28:31 PM
Creation date
10/19/2023 3:19:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />V <br />Chaifrnan Schrocdcr and Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorsc. Cit> Administrator <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />September 16, 1*594 <br />SUBJECT: #1965 James Lear, 2525 Dunwtxxly Avenue - V'ariance - Public Hearing <br />Application: Request for variance and conditional use pennit to construct retaining walls in <br />lakeshore yard to repair a tailing lakeshore bank. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owners List <br />D - Survey <br />E - Topography Map <br />F - Sketch of ^oposed Walls <br />G * City Engineer's Comments <br />H - Revised Plan (Rev’d 9/16/94) <br />I - Cross Sections (Reev’d 9/16/94) <br />J - Letters of Transmittal (Rev’d 9/16/94) <br />Discussion <br />Applicant is Gustafson Design on behalf of James Lear, the property owner. This property has <br />a lakeshore bank rising appro.ximately 20’ above the lake with a slope of around 50%. The bank <br />is starting to experience a slump problem on the northerly half ot the property. <br />The applicant initially provided only a conceptual sketch for a wall system. City Engineer <br />Shawn Gustafson requested much additional detail which was not submi ted until midday on <br />Friday, September 16th. Gustafson has not had a chance to comme;it in writing, but his <br />indication to me at 1:15 p.m. today was that while the additional material provided is helpful, <br />it does not appear to be an engineered designed, it appears to be a boulder wall, and he has <br />severe reserv'ations about recommending approval tor boulder walls. <br />The proposal does m)t provide any detail as to the amount of hardcover that will be add<‘d by <br />the walls. A hardcover calculation should also be provided. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends tabling this item until the information submitted to the City Engineer has been <br />reviewed and found acceptable by the Engineer. Planning Commission may want to give <br />applicant conceptual direction in regards to the project. <br />ch
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.