My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
09-19-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2023 3:28:31 PM
Creation date
10/19/2023 3:19:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />1 <br />i « <br />J <br />1 <br />1 w <br />1 <br />1 <br />■J <br />.1 <br />i <br />The Point Runoff Hydrographs were multiplied by <br />the specific acreages and combined to generate <br />a single point hydrograph for the sub-watershed <br />area. The slope, distance, and flowing comfigura <br />tion were considered in calculating the time of <br />concentration to collect the runoff at a common <br />point to form the Runoff Hydrograph. <br />An equation for the storage area for each sub <br />watershed was developed to relate the storage <br />avaialble at elevations above normal water level. <br />The outflow equations were derived for the dis <br />charge from the storage area to relate outflow <br />rate to elevation above normal. The runoff was <br />then put into the storage area and the rise in <br />water level and outflow were calculated for each <br />time increment. This produced the Outflow Hydro <br />graph which was then routed through the channel <br />to the next sub-watershed storage area with the <br />timing and flow dependent on the slope and con <br />figuration of the channel. <br />A summary of the information generated is given <br />in Table 1, Simulated Storm Water Runoff Hydrologic <br />Data. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <br />B. Water Quality Considerations <br />The following method was used to analyze storm water <br />runoff quality utilizing natural means for filtering <br />and improving the quality of the water. <br />One means for evaluating water quality is the quantity <br />of algae in the lake. The exact quantity of algae <br />present in a lake is a complex function of many environ <br />mental parameters, but the size of the population is <br />closely related to the rate at which nutrients are <br />supplied. Nutrients are supplied at varying rates, <br />and the single nutrient supplied at the slowest rate <br />relative to need exerts a controlling effect on algae <br />growth. <br />The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency study titled <br />"A Program for Preserving the Quality of Lake ilinnetonka <br />determined that phosphorus was the limiting nutrient <br />in Lake Minnetonka. <br />Pollution loads to the marshes and ponds were determined <br />based on phosphorus as the limiting nutrient. These <br />loads took into consideration tributary acreage and <br />potential development on the <br />Maximum phosphorus loading comes f’ <br />residential.development and is 3.46 Ibs/acre/year. <br />VI-4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.