09-19-1994 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1953 Aueusi 4, 1994 Page 2 F - Mardco^’er Facts G - Existing Floor Planw II - F’roposed Floor Plan 1 - Elcvation/Scciiffli J - Lakeshorc Setb^k Determination Description of Request Applicant premises the removal of the rear enirx addition at 8.5 '\9.9’ and replacement with a new entr> addition at I2’xl8* with a rear attached 10 x10’ deck. Refer to FAhibits D. E and II. lire new construction will extend no further into the substandard side yard than the existing structure at 6’. The proposed 12’xl8’ addition will be located less than 4’ from the existing garage; the grade level deck would be 8 1/2’. Upon your site inspection, note the overhang of the garage and review Exhibit I. The 1 ’ overhang will result in a separation setback of less than 3’ requiring special fire wall consta'ction. The propt>sed improvement results in an excess of structural coverage at 302.5 s.f. or 4.49%. Structural coverage exists at 17.5% and will be increased to 19.5%. Statement of Hardship Applicant has not submitted a statement of hardship and w ill be asked to provide one at v t)ur meeting. Hardships are obvious. Tlie lot is .15 acres in area and 50 ’ in width. Of the 18 Livingston Avenue lots designated on the plat map. Exhibit B. 11 or 61% of the developed lots are single lots equal to oi less in area. The propo.scd improvement is similar to the pattern of recent improvement to homes within the Navarre Heights area. Issues for Consideration 1. Is structural coverage excess proposed tcxi great tor this property? What ot the proximity' of other structures on the adjacent parcel? 2. Will you approve a separation setback of less than 3’? 3. Should the structural expansions be reduced? 4. Is the side setback of 6’ acceptable as long as it extends no further into the substandard vard? 5. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission.