My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
08-15-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2023 4:01:06 PM
Creation date
10/18/2023 3:53:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1948 <br />August 11, 1994 <br />Pace 3 <br />Since the 1985 review, the cexle was amended in July of 198b providing for a conditional use <br />for stables and bams, private or public, and for a riding academy use as noted alH>ve. Section <br />10.20. Subd. 3 (P) - riding academy use states that only the owner shall conduct the training <br />activities associated with the riding academy. The applicant is not an owner and a variance is <br />required to one of the performance standards of the conditional use permit. During the 1985 <br />review all training and other activities were either conducted by the owners or their daughter. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the fact that a non-resident/owner of the property shall operate the riding <br />academy raise any concerns? What was the intent of that specific standard of the <br />ordinance? Does the hobby farm use change because the operation is no longer <br />conducted by the owner (more commercial) -- or was the intensification in use <br />and add ons of uses under the Kokesh years of operation already at a far more <br />intense commercial use than a true hobby farm use.' This issue is key for this <br />review and members should be prepared to respond. <br />2. Ms. Hamton has provided a schedule that records various levels of activity during <br />the day and the months of operation noting when deliveries and certain sized <br />vehicles will be entering the property. These activities will be greatly reduced <br />from the former operation that was at a maximum ot twenty-live horses in <br />addition to all the other traffic and deliveries associated with the other add on <br />uses. Is there a phase of Ms. Harmon ’s operation that raises any concerns? <br />3. Staff can confirm that the riding stable and the horse bam are located 150’ from <br />the lot line but staff cannot confirm that training areas are 75’ from all lot lines. <br />It is not clear from the information received as to where these training areas will <br />be located. There are no setbacks for horses that are placed out in their pastures <br />(turn out) but the training area is another matter. It appears that steeplechase <br />activities are conducted close to the Watertown Road area at the southeast comer, <br />refer to your aerial photo. It will be necessary to have Ms. Harmon provide <br />more detailed site plan locating areas of her operation, specifically, the training <br />areas defined on the site plan. <br />4. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. <br />Options of Action <br />Denial finding proposed use to be in complete confiict with the intent of the code that <br />encouraged hobby farm use exclusively for the owners of the property, or
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.