My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-15-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
08-15-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2023 4:01:06 PM
Creation date
10/18/2023 3:53:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />j- D <br /># <br /># <br />OROHO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 24, 1991 <br />Ti®)bardcover review continued <br />that the approval was of a conceptual nature and nore detailed <br />standards would be discussed. She indicated that she would like <br />to have rcore definitive standards incorporated into the Ordinance <br />Anendnent, and suggested referring the issue to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Butler stated that Council may wish to prohibit use of the <br />non-woven fabric within the 0-75 foot setback area. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that she, too, was of the <br />understanding that some restrictions would be incorporated into <br />the Ordinance Amendment. She added that she had not intended to <br />allow the use of the non-woven fabric within the 0-75 foot <br />setback area. <br />Callahan, who had voted against the motion to allow the use <br />of non-woven fabric, indicated that his understanding of <br />Council's action was that non-woven, geotechnic fabric, v/ould not <br />be considered as hardcover. <br />Jabbour suggested assigning a certain percentage for which <br />non-woven fabric would be considered as hardcover. He said, "If <br />we assign as certain factor to the non-woven fabric, we can more <br />easily control the e.'ctent of its use. If it is considered as <br />even a fraction of a percent of hardcover, it cannot be used in <br />the 0-75 foot setback area at all, as we do not allow anything <br />there." He asked Gaffron to comment on his proposal. <br />Gaffron indicated that he would prefer that a hardcover <br />factor not be assigned to the non-woven as it would further <br />complicate an already complex calculation, that from experience <br />seems often impossible for anyone but City Staff to do correctly. <br />He said, "If it is Council’s wish to have nothing but trees, <br />shrubs, and grass within the 0-75 foot setback area, then that <br />should be stated, though there will be numerous Variance <br />requests." <br />Mabusth noted that geotechnic fabric has been used as a <br />method of stabilization for steep, eroding banks along the <br />shoreline. <br />Callahan stated that for the most part, the requests that <br />have come before Council involving landscaping plastic has had to <br />do with its removal as a trade-off for the addition of hardcover <br />elsewhere on that property. He said, "I do not recall an <br />instance where someone has requested a Variance to install <br />landscaping plastic. It may be appropriate to establish a policy <br />stating that non-woven fabric cannot be used as a trade-off for <br />other forms of hardcover. <br />It was the consensus of the Council that this issue should <br />- 7 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.