Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />f tan Nai« wtL I *11 •. * i%^4 ^it #:»p. ^ <br />Ihc t-tmtM. oc oai'jcil (Jlmai ' Second, the o.c mty be c.imlniisJ throojh the C'<y’J “« <br />endnenl domain. Use of this option ia metcly •noC-.Jr way to desenbt . <br />nreeiia’inf nooconfcnni.nt oaea to come Into coopliir.ee with die new rcsulauoiu. WeCiet <br />Lt requirement rett.lt. tn . -iiltinj- wiU depend on the pwticuk. circumsi^cos. T^d. <br />noncontorotni usei miy be elioltuied over a period of Ume throujh irnoinratton. This <br />rn’chinism*requires a nonconformlnf use to tennini*.e after a ptescitbed period ot time <br />elapses The prescribed period of Une under such a mecha.nism n-.ost be sufficient to a.Iow <br />the property owner u. mcoup his o: her investment in the ncnconfonnint use. <br />AS mentioned above. U-.e City may force a pa.-ticular ptopertv o^er with a preealstin* <br />lawful use of his or her properiy to comply wiJt the new <br />becomes wheiher L'la: property owracr can come mio compliance and sail be able to use ttc <br />nroperty in the wav it was being used prior to Cie Ciiy’* tdopiicn of Uw amendments. For <br />LLce an extsung nanna may have so llule remaining open space Uui u u impossible o <br />m ^e recuired number of parking spaces on Cic open space on the property, ^qulrlng iinct <br />compUance with the requires-nenis of the new provisions of the code would make <br />ineligible for a condUlonal um pennit, thereby forcing the property owner out of business and <br />probably uiggering a "taking" claim. <br />Conversely, sn eslsUng marini may have sufnaeut space foi ilte pmlunl sta.Is <br />ten-uired bv the new regulaUons Under such ciicuuisunces. th.e mama would be able to <br />romply wld. the new rhulatlons and obtain a conditional use permit. An «»umeni mat me <br />prop^4' ‘“1 ** considerably icss persuasive under such ctrcumsiances. <br />Because me consequences of bringing pteesisling nonconforming marina uses into <br />compliance are so dependent on Uie circumstances of the patucolir marina, we “ <br />ofiSng variances to the conditional u.e pennii requirements in cases where imposidon of <br />those requirements would visit a parUcularly harsh hardship upon Uic <br />avoid "taking" the propeny. In each case, ihe City can decide which of the <br />ouUlned above is the most cffccUvc way to uliimaicly eliminate <br />will allow Lhe City to aggressively enforce the zoning amendments In rinim^ hv <br />IKUe. if any. hardship will be suffered while also avoiding unnecessary takings clai s by <br />granting variances for those marinas that need them to stay In business. <br />elements, or natural disaster. <br />2U/::05I41J7/|7.*54 <br />J