Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINLTKS «« THE OKONO PLANNING COMMISSION PL3LIC HE \Hlvr <br />PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 10 41 ' <br />B-2 LAKFNHOKE Bl SINT:SS DISTRICT HEED ON JINT 6 IW4 <br />Rowlene «fcfcd thji ihenr may nw he 100* aereemera by eveo'>nc lo ihe proposed a.mndMK <br />bur It 15 bener than »hat eaisicd Changes can be made if necessary if there are pans ihal don i <br />work <br />Smi* «ked what the neat step would he. Gaffron responded that the draft ordinance would <br />likely be brought to Council in about three weeks. June 2T. with the Plannine Commtssion <br />recommendation lor adoption. <br />Smith restated that the approach taken b}' the Planning ComnuNsion was to conceptuallv dexeloi <br />a more workable ordinance by rea>gnizing that the mannas are member of the communiiv and <br />have cerum responsibilities. By drafting the ordinance as the Plannmc Commission did there <br />will be more give and take than in the past to work together with the marinas Although some <br />new uses arc proposed, there arc M^me strings att:iched. <br />Gaffron reiterated' that input had been received from the public and marina owners. Soint; <br />aspects of what the marinas do can make them a 'bad neighKir" but gencrallv ihev are rK)i <br />problem neighKirs. " ' ' ' <br />Peterson added that there Wk>uld always be problems when there is a business <br />area.in a residential <br />Gaffron commerued that providing marinas with more use options retlects what is happemna <br />today and is a 'trade off for the marinas. The City should consider working with Ihe marina.. <br />noi acainsl them, and assist them m being an amenity rather than irs ina to stop them from l« in? <br />a problem. “ ^ <br />Lindquist reiterated that the Planning Commission purposely decided to write the ordinance with <br />Standards as they exist rather than changing it to meet the existing physical characteristics of ilif* <br />marinas <br />Mabusth stated that there were problems w ith some of the marinas as they exist because h'*i <br />is a ’’grandtathcr " situation with some of the uses. <br />Gaffron thought additional language ma> be needed to address some of the existing uses that will <br />now become conditional uses. Gaffron will request that the City Attorney review the draft ai <br />discuss the entorcemeni oi conditionaf use permits for uses that afready exist. Membi': <br />requested that they get copies ot the Attorney s opinion before the Pfanning Commission meeti’ig <br />ot June -0 it possibfe so changes coufd be made at that nieetiru! if thev were necessarv. <br />Beverly Blomberg. 3180 .North Shore Drive, armed late and commended the PlaiDi*’ir» <br />Commission for their well done work. Peterson thanked her for her attendance and intere.s* in <br />previous meetings.