Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1945 <br />July 12. 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Applicant has not proposed reductions in hardcover, as they advise they are iK>t adding <br />new hardcover. The proposal does consist of an intensification of structural hardcover <br />should additional structural or nonstructural removals he considered: <br />a) 380 s.f. or 5.62% of landscape area underlain with plastic. <br />b) Approximately 543 s.f. or 8 03% siUewalk/paving improvements <br />Should applicant be asked to reduce existing haj-dcover when application does not <br />involve an increase in hardcover .* <br />2. Structural coverage is at 19.3%. Tfie only possible reduction in stnictural coverage tm <br />this property would be removal of sections of the existing deck. If structural coverage <br />additions are not proposed, would this be necessary? <br />3. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. <br />Options of .Action <br />To approve the variance application of Roben and Velma Wolff that would {lermit construction <br />of a 10 ’.xl4 ’ three season porch within the southwest comer of their lakeside deck grrmting <br />hardcover variances within the 75-250' setback area, a side setback variance of 6.5’, .i 26 <br />encroachment of the average lakeshorc setback line and lot coverage variance of _?_%• subject <br />to the condition that all improvements scheduled lor removal must be completed prior to the first <br />trarning inspection by the Orono Building siatT.