My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
06-20-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2023 3:39:50 PM
Creation date
10/18/2023 3:34:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. <br />6V <br />. f <br />i <br />Zoning File #1936 <br />June 14, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />L - Average Lakeshore Setback - Survey <br />M - Floor Plan <br />N - Elevations <br />Description of Request <br />Applicant proposes an approximate 15 ’ x 33’ addition to the west side of the existing <br />residence consisting of an expanded famUy room and kitchen addition, new covered porch and <br />entry. The majority of the structure will be located in front of the average lakeshore setback <br />line. The addition will have little impact on the residence structure to the west. The residence <br />to the east side will not be able to view structure as it is entirely blocked by the Troyak <br />residence. No other variances are required. <br />Statement of Hardship <br />Please review Exhibits A and B. Applicant notes that the following unique findings and <br />hardships: <br />1. Home was constructed 85 years ago, prior to the current standards for shoreland <br />development. <br />2. All current standards for development are met except for the average lakeshore <br />setback standard. <br />3. The house to the west has no view windows on the west side. <br />4. The residence on the east will not see the addition as it will be placed entirely <br />behind the existing residence. <br />5. There is a mature woods between the residence to the west and the Troyak <br />residence. <br />6. Staff would add the curvature of the shoreline. <br />Staff Comments <br />In light of certain comments made by applicant to both Council and Planning Commission <br />members, staff feels it necessary to make the following comments: <br />To stafFs knowledge, the first person to view the March 1994 survey of the proposed <br />improvements was the Building Official sometime after the filing of the May 2nd <br />building permit application (review Exhibits H and I). The survey information was <br />complete as staff had advised Mr. Troyak at the time he discussed his proposed <br />improvement that the addition would also be subject to an average lakeshore setback. <br />The need for the variance is not determined by the location of the addition as it relates <br />'■-mm <br />♦
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.