Laserfiche WebLink
,r, —... <br />^ . <br />D <br />TO:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />FROM; Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager <br />DATE:June 9, 1994 <br />SUBJECT: Application #1933 Tandem Properties - Septic Review <br />I have reviewed the proposed septic system testing and design for this property and would make <br />the following comments. <br />Due to newly defined wetland areas, the drainfield sites must need different setbacks than <br />normally required. Wetland classification identification and delineation were performed by <br />Franklin J. Svoboda & Associates which indicated Type I and II wetlands not previously located <br />on the City’s wetland inventory maps. The City’s inventory maps designate primarily Type III, <br />IV, or V wetlands v hich have standing water during much of the year. As the Type I and II <br />wetlands do not contain standing water during the growing season, drainfield sites must be <br />located outside of the wetlands, however the normal 75 ’ setback will not be required for these <br />wetland areas. <br />Site evaluation and septic system design were performed by S-P Testing for the second phase <br />of both Dickey and Coffin sites. All soil boring holes have been located on the surveys of these <br />properties. All drainfield sites on both properties meet the required lot line, driveway, well and <br />wetland setbacks and are located on slopes less than 6%. <br />Based on the information provided, I would recommend approval of the application. <br />,