My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
10-16-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2023 8:10:33 AM
Creation date
10/13/2023 3:07:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
10/13/2023 3:36 PM
Modified:
10/13/2023 3:36 PM
Text:
PC Exhibit B
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1513 BAY RIDGE ROAD <br />ORONO, MN 55391 <br />APPEAL NARRATIVE <br />Robert S. Tripp Snyder, the owner of 1513 Bay Ridge Road, Orono, MN 55391 applied for and <br />received a building permit to replace the existing deck attached to the lakeshore side of the <br />property. The original plan showed the stairs from the deck proceeding from the northeast corner <br />of the deck to an existing concrete landing. The deck work passed the foundation and framing <br />inspections. When the inspector noticed where the stairs would meet the existing concretelanding <br />he indicated that the plan as built for the stairs would require a complete re -construction of the <br />existing landing, as the landing area did not meet current city code. Because of the way the <br />landing intersected with the remaining concrete stairs, increasing the size of the landing to meet <br />code would have required a complete reconstruction of the remaining concrete stairs leading to <br />the flagstone fire pit area. <br />It was decided that a safer way to exit the new deck would be stairs going from the same corner <br />of the deck, but proceeding down from the deck in an easterly direction which was toward the <br />lake. This relocation of the stairs resulted in the ability to make the stairs wider and intersect a <br />flat landing area well over six feet wide and deep. <br />When the inspector saw the revised stairs, he indicated that the revised stair plan was in violation <br />of the Average Lake Setback requirement, as it proceeded approximately two feet farther <br />towards the lake than the previous stairs did, and indicated that the deck would fail its inspection <br />with the current stair location. <br />Upon hearing this, Mr. Snyder researched the city code, specifically Section 78-1279, Paragraph <br />6, which specifically exempts stairs from the Average Lake Setback requirements. This was <br />pointed out to the city planner in an email and again in a personal visit. The planning department <br />is taking the position that the stair exemption applies only to stairs going down to docks. This <br />position is in direct contradiction to the clear wording of Code Section 78-1279 Paragraph 6, <br />which does not refer to docks at all, but does refer specifically to decks and stairs. <br />Mr. Snyder asks the Planning Commission and the City Council to rule that the clear wording of <br />Code Section 78-1279 Paragraph 6 exempts stairs from the Average Lake Setback requirements, <br />and thus the deck with its revised stair placement should pass its final inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.