05-16-1994 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r Request for CouiKiI Action continued page 2 of 3 May 4. itm 4fl912 Tim Hillman. 400 Uaf Street be removed before a building permit could be issued. Review Exhibits E and F. the conceptual elevations of the structure depicting a 2'2-story structure wtnild not appear to present a height pri>blem Applicant is adv ised that height of structure is determirerd from existing elevations and 4‘ of till may require alterations in design. Ihe applicant advised the Planning Commission that he wimld be responsible tor the building of the structure. The Planning Commission advised that all construction would be subject to Section 12.05. Subdivisions 1 and 2 of the Municipal Code dealing with time constraints on residential construction. At the time of the Planning Commission review, the applicant advised that there were Ik) formal easements granted to the property to the east. If an easement existed, the area of the access easement would have to be deducted from the total lot area Review Page 1 of the stall memo of April 14. 1994 Note lot coverage was propv^sed at 14.15J. The neighNir to the east who is in complete support of applicant's improvement project, advises that there is a 20’ casement in favor of their property (review Exhibit J). The reduction in lof area creates a lot coverage excess now proposed at 16.15J. Revised lot coverage facts are reviewed as follows: Lot area = 36.239 s.f. Adjusted lot area = 32,899 s.f. (reduction of 3.340 s.f. of driveway easement) Allowed = 4.934.85 s.f. or 15% Existing = 3.069.3 s.f. or 9.32% Proposed = 5,298.9 s.f. or 16.1% (2.229.6 s.f. of additional structure. This includes a 26* X 6’ upper level deck on south side of structure. ) I he application now would require side and street setback variances and a lot coverage variance of 1.1%. The majority of the Planning Commission approved the application for the side and street setback variances as proposed, subject to the following conditions: That applicant shall adhere to time limits for construction as ^^et forth in Municipal Code. The exterior of the garage to the immediate rear of the structure shall be repaired so as to match the exterior construction materials of new residence and that this improvement is to be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for new' residence. J