Laserfiche WebLink
TO:Planning Comniission McinN^rs <br />Ron Moorsc, City Admimstraior <br />FROM:Jeanne A. Nfabusth. Building & Zcmng Administrator <br />DATK: May 10. 1994 <br />SfBJKCT: #1911 Ernest Lemmerman. 4620 Tonkaview lime - Variances <br />Continuation ot Public Hearing <br />Pertinent Ordinances <br />Refer to staff memo of March 16. 1994, Exhibit A. <br />Ordinance #P6 :™l Scries. Amendniem rcdetlnine topof hluiT. The anicndmem reads <br />" s iha, po.™ on die c.oss section of a bluff helow <br />more th.m IS'J andabove sshich ihe aserage slope lor a disiance ol .10 or more 18 <br />or less. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Staff Memo 3/16/94 <br />B - Ordinance #126. 2nd Series <br />C - Sketch of New Building Envelope. Detined by Required <br />Setbacks from Lot Lines and Top of Blutt <br />D - Dimensions ot Building En\elope <br />Status of Application <br />Ai the March 21si mceiing of the Planning Commission, the application was tabled pending <br />resolve of the zoning amendment redefining top ot blutt. Ihe variance inclines of <br />a comnrLnsive application involving a subdivision proposing a realigntitenf ot <br />arniicanfs homestead parcel and Ihe contiguous undeveloped lot also owned by appitc.tm. <br />apStalion for subdtviLn was conceptually reviewed by .he Council and r«c.ved unanimous <br />supptirt. <br />The issue of the bluff impact and required setbacks from bluff were not addressed during ^ <br />mKl vAfoii review In facl the bluff ordinance was not enforced or uiiplenienied until February <br />ihU vear The code section has had a major impact on many ol the lakeshore applicatio^ <br />^omrilmd h, ih': ct rdet-inition for die top of bluff has been amended in an attempi to <br />make it less restrictive. <br />Members are asked to review ll,vbibits C and D We had <br />would allow for a simple visual imeirrciahoh ‘“P “ ^l die 1010 <br />rairrrpet^intm rr-rif* " 'rn ‘Ldmg eieva.lo„ opet. up <br />1