Laserfiche WebLink
CeiJ Strauss <br />March 29, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />Proposed Redefinition^ of "Top nf Rii.ff’ <br />TT.C followmg facts and premises seem critical to us in the discussion of bluffs: <br />Steep slopes" are those exceeding 12%. <br />• DMR a bluff. <br />bluff, aS LTsL\fo°per,TlT% o?mX for 50-“i P"* ^and upper points of a bluff. ^gments that define the lower <br />be conc'erard^toui Ihriifpa'cB rfyet^’steeMo'^7as <br />slopes of 12-18 % which are of somewhat les J cmcer^ "'“P <br />We propose to redefine the "top of bluff" as "th-jr nnint ei, <br />^^ch the slope becomes more than 18% and above which th ^ of a bluff below <br />50 or more is 18% or less". This 18®^ "hrf»'iirT% • » i. ^ average slope for a distance of <br />contour topographic maps which me City has resSuy'ava'iStte “sing standard 2’ <br />work by an applicant ’s licensed surveyor wou7d ato Ltcept^^^ '°P°«”Phic survey <br />eXtrfofbSetS - - <br />rDNpVLTnr^ofbifpr^^^^^^^ “ we feel Uutt it meets <br />blutr detenuination, and yields a guamifiable facL7e"ofT"“ <br />fmd it accepm7.“'TOs74°on ^'Tch^ukTfo'rTS >« if you <br />Commission meeting. ^ ^ ^ heanng at the April 18 Planning <br />As always, please contact me at 478-7357 if you have questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />Michael P. Gaffron <br />Assistant Planning & Zoiung Admimstrator <br />MPG/Isv <br />cc: