Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
Zoning File If 1914 <br />April I3, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />Both ihe Traff and Colwell residences are currently served with septic systems, although <br />Colwells* current Lot 1 is within the MUSA boundary and has a sewer stub on County Road 84 <br />approximately 900 ’ west of their existing residence. <br />Plat vs. Division/Combination? <br />The subdivision code gives no clear direction whether this lot line rearrangement should <br />be structured as the division/combination proposed or whether it should constinite a replat into <br />two lots It is left to the discretion of the applicants and the advice of their surveyor as well as <br />requirements of the County Surveyor’s Office as to which method will be acceptable. <br />Additional Information <br />The proposed lot line rearrangement has no impact on existing or future septic systems. <br />The proposed lot line rearrangement includes granting drainage and utility easements 5 <br />either side of the new dividing line between the properties. The proposal does not specify a <br />request to vacate drainage and utility easements along existing property lines. Staff has no <br />knowledge of whether certain of those easements contain existing utilities. Any future <br />application to vacate those easements would require confirmation of their current use. <br />Conceptually, however, the City would have no objection to such a vacation. (It will be noted <br />that the conservation and flowage easement for French Lake wetlands, while shown on the <br />original plat as drainage and utility easements, could not be vacated). <br />The proposed lot line rearrangement has no impact on setbacks for existing structures <br />The Traff residence will continue to access onto North Shore Drive. The Colwell <br />residence will continue to access onto Old Crystal Bay Road. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />The proposed lot line rearrangement appears to meet all requirements of the RR-IB Single <br />Family Rural Residential Zone. Staff recommends approval under either of the following options <br />to be chosen by the applicants: <br />A. <br />B. <br />Legal combination of all resultant parcels as a simple lot line rearrangement; or <br />Replat into two separate lots. <br />Isv