My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
04-18-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2023 2:50:38 PM
Creation date
10/11/2023 2:28:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
421
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
III. <br />we exhort the parties to work together to arrive at a <br />satisfactory solution to this controversy. PRB-1 requires the city <br />reasonably to accommodate Pentel's needs as an amateur radio <br />operator; what is allowed is the ••minimum practicable regulation <br />[necessary] to accomplish the local authority's legitimate <br />purpose." PRB-1 5 25. The District Court's grant of summary <br />judgment to the city is reversed, and the case is remanded to the <br />District Court for the entry of summary judgment in favor of <br />Pentel. Our decision does not mean that the city necessarily must <br />grant Pentel's application as it now stands, but it does mean that <br />the city must make a reasonable accommodation for her interests. <br />A true copy. <br />Attest: <br />CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. <br />-10-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.