My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-1994 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
04-18-1994 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2023 2:50:38 PM
Creation date
10/11/2023 2:28:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
421
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
smalt antennas is that they present less surface area to <br />passing radio waves, and are therefore less effective m <br />picking up incoming sigr^ais This effect is terrried picKup <br />efficiency Pickup efficiency is reciprocative, it applies, <br />to transmitted signals as well as to received signals To <br />obtain higher pickup efficiency and therefore greater <br />communications effectiveness, many antenna ele.me.nts <br />are required at VHF and UHF The elements are usually <br />installed on multiple booms Single, vertical radiators, <br />even at elevated heights, are ineffective for distances <br />beyond a few miles at these frequency ranges This is <br />true because of tow pickup efficiency and because of tie <br />orr iidireciional characteristic of the radiator Stacked <br />vertical radiators are sometimes used to obtain gam witfi <br />omnidirectionat cove'age <br />Although ionospheric propagation does sometim.es <br />occur at the lower eno of the VHF range, propagation <br />at too MHz and above is almost always over a iine-of- <br />sight path Under usual conditions, signals at these <br />frequencies encounter very little refraction in air There <br />fore It behooves a person using these frequencies to <br />place his antenna as high as possible, so it can "see" <br />farther Certainly the antenna must be above sur <br />rounding objer’s. such as dense foliage and man-made <br />structures Such objects absorb radio-frequency energy <br />in this portion of the spectrum, and therefore tend to <br />block the signal from propagating Objects such as hills, <br />steel structures and many commercial or industrial <br />buildings will block VHF signals to an even greater <br />degree, creating "shadows" behind them <br />At VHF and UHF, the lowest lobes for Yagi arrays <br />at 35 and 70 feet are only a few degrees above the <br />horizontal. However, tor Ime-of-sight communications, <br />the radiation angle should be zeto. if possible, unless <br />one wishes to commumcale with airplanes or objects in <br />outer space Even more desirable are negative angles <br />from high locations, so the antenna can "took down on" <br />the terrain At VHF and UHF the radiation angles for <br />35-foot heights are twice those occurring for the 70-foot <br />heights Therefore at VHF it is also beneficial to place <br />the antenna as high as possible, and in the clear from <br />surrounding objects <br />Amateur Radio operators wishing to contact other <br />amateurs at great distances use a hme-worn but true <br />expression. "For the best results, put your antenna as <br />high as you possibly can " Many amateurs in various <br />parts of the world put their big antennas atop 1 2lv)-foot <br />towers, anc enjoy communications with amateurs in <br />foreign countries when neighboring amateurs with much <br />lower antennas cannot even hear the foreign signals. <br />Conclusion <br />The preceding information has dealt with antenna <br />height and communications effectiveness It has been <br />shown that tor ail amateur frequencies, high horizontal <br />antennas will outperform tow antennas Information has <br />been developed to show a consistent power gam of the <br />higher antennas over low ones, that is. at 70 feet and <br />35 feet The 70-fooi height was chosen only for the <br />purpose of illustration, and is not intended to be <br />construed as the optimum height for antennas Heights <br />above 100 feet will give significantly better performance <br />than at 70 feet. <br />It IS reasonable to assume that if an amateur <br />operator is restricted to the use of low antennas, he will <br />obtain transmitting equipment with a corresponding <br />increase in power output to compensate for the toss of <br />antenna effectiveness For example, he might increase <br />his transmitter power from 500 watts to 1 5 kilowatts to <br />compensate for a three-fold toss in antenna effectiveness <br />because of height limitations. It should be realized that <br />this increase in power, in turn, increases the possibilities <br />for his stronger signal to overload nearby television and <br />radio receivers, creating interference for viewers and <br />listeners. <br />There is one further consideration concerning <br />amateur antenna height with regard to television and <br />radio interference. In essence, the sole source of <br />radiated RF energy from an Amateur Radio station is its <br />antenna Raising that antenna to an increased height, <br />far above the level of exrtmg antennas for television <br />reception, will reduce the possibility of interference to <br />television reception from funoamenial overload
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.