Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />August 28, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 15 <br /> <br />so much the parking as how people park. He suggested the area along Willow should be paved and <br />striped. The parking along Hackberry has not been a problem, based on his conversation with the police <br />chief. He also said there could be a green parking lot off Elm Lane where there could be parking on <br />stabilized grass. He said that would provide more parking than the proposed lot and solve the drainage <br />problems. The character of the park is multi-use and pure fun. Neighbors feel the current proposal will <br />destroy the character. Those are the only T-ball fields in Orono, he said. <br /> <br />Walsh said the next meeting at Hackberry would be 4:30 p.m. Aug 30 in the picnic area to go over plans <br />with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Janie Delaney, 1315 Woodhill Avenue, said she used to coach T-ball at that park. She said she cares <br />about the parks as she lives near the Golf Course and she does not think the neighbors will be happy with <br />a parking lot in the center of the park. She is concerned about the development of pocket parks with <br />facilities as kids do still just get together to play ball. She pointed out the park is in the middle of an <br />existing neighborhood. <br /> <br />Veach said Lemons told her the park concept is for multi-age use. <br /> <br />Lemons said the image doesn’t make it clear but the intent is to keep a T-ball field. He said the vote <br />tonight was just to be able to move forward and apply for grants. <br /> <br />In response to Council questions Edwards said the City has been addressing drainage at Hackberry as it <br />could over time. It had been a fill area and some parts settled. This plan gives the City a template and a <br />concept, he said, along with a cost. Depending on costs and funding the City can prioritize at that point. <br />He said parks are reviewed as part of the Comprehensive Plan that is updated every 10 years. The last <br />time was in 2017. The use of that park has changed, he said, and updates have not been made because it <br />was known the park would be redone, so things like backstops are not in the best shape. He said the City <br />sees grant opportunities pass it by because of not doing the homework to have something ready. It needs <br />to have concept plans. <br /> <br />Benson said her concern is not that the park doesn’t need improvements, but the order in which the <br />process is happening. She said she does not have sufficient data from residents to understand what sorts <br />of grants might be appropriate for this park. She added she is aware that the City doesn’t have enough <br />money to improve the park without grants, so would be dependent on grant money and then perhaps <br />certain interests in the community would fuel the process. <br /> <br />Walsh said this is a beginning process. The City can’t get statistically significant data because it never <br />gets a high enough level of participation from the community. This would move the process forward on a <br />very basic level. <br /> <br />An unidentified resident asked if grants for a given item locks the City into that item. <br /> <br />Edwards said if things were moved around in a plan that is typically not a problem. If a grant is gotten for <br />a soccer field, for example, there needs to be a soccer field. <br /> <br />Crosby said when a park is dilapidated it is unused because it is dilapidated. When parks are improved <br />they are used. He said it is not the vision of the Council to leave parks unimproved but the City will get <br />additional input from the neighbors.