My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-09-2023 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2023
>
10-09-2023 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2023 1:23:54 PM
Creation date
10/10/2023 1:18:29 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />September 25, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 4 of 13 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Johnson asked about hard cover being removed. <br /> <br />Eskuche said a generator and air conditioner units are proposed to be moved to the right side of the house <br />and that hardcover space used for a patio. He said when the applicants submitted for a variance three <br />years ago all the walls toward the lake were timber with plastic underneath. That was all removed. The <br />main thing is conversion of driveway to pool reducing hardcover by about 3.6 percent. <br /> <br />Johnson noted there are a lot of moving parts to this proposal. There is a need to address walls that were <br />put in without permits. <br /> <br />Curtis explained the walls were allowed by the variance but did not have a permit and needs an after-the- <br />fact permit. That is a staff action. <br /> <br />Walsh said he has no problem converting hardcover but the pool would be the addition of a structure. <br /> <br />Johnson said he thought the applicant did a better job of locating the pool where there is existing <br />hardcover and removing other hardcover. When it comes to removal of air conditioners, he said he would <br />support exchange of hardcover but not an addition. He would not have supported the six-foot wall, he <br />said. <br /> <br />Benson said she agreed with the staff’s recommendation to deny the application based on a lack of <br />practical difficulty. <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Veach seconded, to draft an approval resolution in part for LA23-000026, 2605 <br />North Shore Drive, variances, to include the location of the pool, the removal of all the hardcover <br />proposed to be removed and the moving of the air conditioner units, and denial of the six foot stone <br />wall and any additional retaining walls and that the applicant provide an updated plan conforming <br />to the approval. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 1 (Benson). <br /> <br />15. LA22-000064, LEBRISIA IVERSEN, 4448 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, VARIANCE – <br />RESOLUTION NO. 7403 <br /> <br />City Planner Nye said the City Council first reviewed this application at the July 10, 2023 City Council <br />meeting. The Council reviewed a two-story addition with a rooftop terrace above the second story. The <br />proposal also included a new deck on the lakeside of the home. The Council was not supportive of the <br />project as applied and provided feedback to the applicant. The Council identified the difficulty of the <br />small lot and working with a nonconforming building, however, the height of the addition was not <br />supported due to the amount of massing. The Council did not support the new lake deck and stair as they <br />were not in favor of any new expansion lakeward. The Council discussed some support of a one-story <br />addition in the same footprint as the existing deck on the north side of the home. The initial application <br />was not supported by staff and received a split recommendation from the Planning Commission with a <br />vote of 2 to 3 to approve as applied. The applicant has chosen to amend their application by removing the <br />proposed deck on the lake side of the home and reducing the height of the addition. The revised plans <br />show a one-story addition with a similar footprint to that of the existing deck in that location. The <br />addition has been reduced in height and size. However, the revised addition has a decreased side yard <br />setback from the previous iteration. The applicant has provided a revised letter from that impacted
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.