Laserfiche WebLink
B. > TranspoctatioQ <br />1. Relationship to CouBcO policfc* regarding metropoEun highways. <br />Y KT iw . A-«r^KU (Proposed amendment is intended to serve 2L No/Not AppUcabk. existing development) <br />It__Yes. <br />2. Change in t3fpe a"d intenaiQ^ of land uses at interchanges and other locations <br />within a quarter-mite ct the metropolitan highway system? <br />X No/Not Applioble. <br />— Yes. <br />3. Impact on exiting trip geitefalioiL <br />XY^°\^n?*Schools hockey site may generate additional <br />trips if arena is constructed) <br />4. Capacity of toad network to accommodate planned land use(s) (including <br />metropolitan interchanges). <br />^ No^ot Applicable. <br />-JLYcs. <br />5. Impact on transit and parking strategics. <br />X No/Not Applicable. <br />__Yes. <br />6. Docs the proposed amendment contain any changes to the fun<^nal <br />classification of roadways? (These changes require Transportation Advisory <br />Board (TAB) review.) <br />2LNo. <br />Yes. Describe which roadways. <br />Aviation <br />1. Impact on regional airspace. <br />X No/Not Applicable. <br />Yes. <br />2. Impaa on airport search area. <br />^ No/Not Applicable. <br />— Yes. <br />3. Consistency with guidelines for land use compatibility with aircraft noise. <br />y No/Not Applicable. <br />Yes.