Laserfiche WebLink
! r <br />?'■ <br />Zonii^ File #2084 <br />Novoaber 13,1995 <br />Pate2 <br />2,Sye letbacks: <br />ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED VARIANCE <br />3. <br />Existing detacboi garage 2.2 ’(to be removed)10'— <br />Existing house (N. end)i4.r (no change)30'— <br />Propo»d Gar/BR Addition 10’30 ’W <br />(N. side) <br />Existing house, S. end 16.8’(no change)30 ’mm <br />E.xisting Deck/ProposedI 2T 27 30 ’y <br />SuTJoom (E. side) <br />Hardcover; <br />EXISTLNG PROPOSED allow ED variance <br />0-75’0%0«4 054 — <br />75-250’23.9%26.T*/.25"/.1.7% <br />ZSC-SOC 19.4%19.9%30*/.— <br />Ducussion <br />Applicants recently purchased this residence and propose two specific additions: <br />- Guest bedrwnx'bath with attached garage (existing detached garage to be <br />removed). <br />- Replace existing open deck with enclosed sunroom. <br />This neighborhood was developed in the late 1950 ’s/'early 1960 ’s, and the lots average 100' <br />in width, ranging from one-half to one acre in area. 1 he 30 ’ required side setbacks of the <br />two acre LR-1A zone result in most ot the existing homes being non-conforming, since they <br />were built typically with 10' side setbacks when the zoning allowed that to occur. <br />The proposed attached garage/guest bedroom wing will at its closest point be 10' from the <br />north side lot line where the existing house is slightly over 14' from the lot line. The <br />addition is perpendicular to the house and therefore not parallel to the lot line, since all of <br />the houses in this n< ighbo hood iire slightly angled to take advantage of lake views. <br />Applicant correctly notes that a detached garage could be located as near as 10' to the side <br />lot line, although that would not be in keeping with the neighborhood. This proposal will <br />eliminate the last remaining detached garage in the neighborhood.