12-11-1995 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 20. 1995 (#13 - #2089 Richard Miller - Continued) There were no public comments. Lindquist moved. Hawn seconded, to approve .\ppUcation «0S9 with the hardships listed and with noting the zoning at the time of purchase. Vote Ayes 5. Nays 0. (#14) #2091 BURTON SCOTT BALL, 1065 FERND.ALE ROAD WEST- VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARLNG - 11:15-11:25 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit ot Publication were noted. The Applicant was present. Gaffi-on reported that the existing residence is mainly located within the ' 5’ zone wath a deck on the lakeside. There is also a 4' overhang on the house Gafiron s|ud the request for a bav window above the deck and under the overhang but within the 4 ot the overhang at 3’. This application would involve the expansion of one bay window and the addition ot two more. Gaffron commented that the hardcover is significant on this propetty. The proposal could increase the encroachment to the lakeside by 3' The west end is 47 from the lake^ At midpoint, the residence is 51 5' trom the lake. On the east end. the residenee ,s 4a from the lake Hardcover e.cists in the 0-75' zone at 36 814. 41 dl b ,n the 75-250 “"e. “<• conforms in the 250-500' zone at 13.6%. The overall hardcover exists at j6. I /o. The DNTI recommends hardcover for an entire property at 25® o. Gaffron noted that the tennis coun located in the driveway has appeared since 1991. In comparison with a survey submitted by the previous owner for a previous application, the drivetvay and court have e.xpanded. He noted the rock and plastic along the house but commented that it is narrower in width than the 4’ overhang but still considered hardcover. Gaffron brought two questions before the Planning Commissioners for their consideration Should the bay windows be approved allowing a fimher encroachment of 3’ and should approval be tied to the hardcover. Peterson commented that there was the perception of more encroachment but was nm realiv closer when considenng the overhang Gaffron suggested that the bulk ot the house wasuetting closer to the lake, and the proposal did add more structure m the 0-75 zone. While the Overhang was more of an encro.achment, the addition to the bulk requires for need for the variances.