Laserfiche WebLink
anNUTES OF THE l AKE USE COMMITTEE - March 24, 1993 <br />• • The DNR oirrcntlv does not have enough funding to <br />vcors hcTo. cc.4 h... <br />Kelley asked how the DNR <br />Cdmdo “-1o° ““ <br />future. <br />Coe.eo asked how .e hr^lTfo " a%“t <br />d h"affa::;7;u:7h.lca.ed heoches woold he heoer.clal. <br />Schroeder asked again about teSd'anv^"* flm'thrMlxwen Bay group, <br />scong feelings about ^ She thought the <br />Goetten thougnt CaUahan thought it might be easier to close at <br />City could close it for some time l ^ ^ Closing should be done with signage and <br />10:00 p.m. rather than not openin, u ’ . Bellows asked if a gate could be considered <br />not plowing would effectively close .t m the Js bubblers, this is unsafe in <br />at the ramp as previously dis,.usse . . discussed in the Maxwell Bay group, <br />the winter The winter sr.owmobUe problem has be.n ais,.ass <br />Lw these are maintained and enforced would be an issue. <br />Gaffron noted the DNR S^lufriieT^e of it for them e.xcep^t <br />agreement either with the C.ty or some . i jjiis ^35 mentioned at the County since <br />for major maintenance such as repavmg^ p Countv crew to mow and pickup <br />they already maintam North ^ved bv the appropriate people at the County. <br />cw u »* ij». ”• ”>;;rs sSS™. <br />He feels this access is for non-Orono ^ ^ Orono residents. If we have <br />be from Orono. Therefore, these costs should DNR budget. <br />an agreement with ±e facilk^'iU be from Hennepin County residents and <br />KeUev would expect most or the use ^ • doesn’t solve the problem of lost tax <br />mavbe the County should mamtam the site. That still deesn <br />revenue (S8,000/year) and costs of policmg. <br />is: sz’SS ~ *'ErXE'iS.vr