Laserfiche WebLink
as <br />not <br />MES-UTES of the L.XKE USE COMMITTEE - March 24, 1993 <br />PO.cr.aa. for —* <br />^ «f -an -aiTTe-nen: with the DNR, the City should have the <br />KcUcy suggested that as P“" out or additions need to be made. <br />need to accent some responstodity m temna tor our <br />u 1.4- -^nnnHc Gaffton cxolaihcd that thc tv’pc ofholdihg pohd <br />Schroeder inquired about ^ lake level with slopes at 3:1. It <br />at this access would likely be a The'intent would be to have some senling time for <br />would collect runoff and re.e^c it - noatinc' diings like gasoline, etc. from the parkmg <br />sediment with skimmers (barise vvoid be 4 or 5 of these with no trees in the basin, <br />lot, from gening to the laxe. The e would marinas. Gaffron replied they <br />Schroeder asked if this rmrt in the future Minnetonka Boat Works has a holding <br />absolutely could be and would be Voout 5 years with little or no sediment <br />Mabusth asked tf the issue^oi <br />what would need to be done to • ’ have'jurisdicuon over this. The DNR has <br />responded it was a concern but Orono <jredgin8 too deeply 3-4 years ago. <br />required Gayle’s to do some from the sale may be that <br />L%R «mP>-^ <br />residential area. <br />Coetten asked if the -mess’ -o <br />agreement as she would not want tlus to faU on i^^oived in any of the discussions. It <br />ber.veen Gayle’s and the DNR an rp-ment that this restoration would not be the <br />.culd a good idea to put this m the agreement <br />;X"4-uM -. come bac.k and require <br />According to Dennis from the Countv', <br />mis area mat he is aware of because he “ f U would be a harard to <br />TormfSh^t ‘tesrbirt^th;^ " - - - of mis also but It should be noted <br />to them.