Laserfiche WebLink
Request for Council Action continued <br />page 2 of 3 <br />December 6, 1995 <br />Zoning File <5^2078 <br />Brief Review of Application <br />For more detail on this review please refer to the enclosed statTmemos dated October 10 1995 and <br />November 13, 1995 and the Minutes of the October and November meetings of the Plannin, <br />_ A •Commission. <br />The subdivision was reviewed at both the October and November meetmu of the Planning <br />SmmtL At the October meeting a sketch plan application was on the agenda mvo ung <br />Ses to ihe southwest of the subject propeny. The application invol ved the vacm.on of publ c <br />Ss Xvay and the replat of multi parcels into 3 residential lots, re er to Exlub, F. Nme e <br />oronertv defiLd as Parcel A on that exhibit achieves access via a 30' wide easement along *c soul <br />foTCof Lm - o “L current division. Parcel A is located both within the LR- B zoning district <br />Ind rs wttWMhe Metropolitan Urban Service ,\rea. The only public access to this property is via <br />he untaptvod 20 v3th public rights-of-way proposed to be vacated with the sketch p^ <br />aoDlication. The Planning Commission advised that a public access would hate to be teamed ^ <br />serve Parcel A should development occur in the future and that in lieu ol app-ovmg the vaca ion. c <br />"pplka^rwould have to create additional right-of-way for Linden Avenue. 1 he expanded Linden <br />Avenue must be designed to sen'e Parcel A. <br />.,nnlirntion was tabled at the October meeting as Jim Jensen representing the owner, Frank <br />n v*' hnd no knovvledue as to the exact width and area of the easement within Lot - that ser\ es <br />P^^*1 A It was also hoped that the additional time would allow the applicant and adjacent owners <br />r„ taher di^^^ass poSlc acquisilion of kind from Mr. BcnnC. lo include in expanded Linden <br />Avenue. <br />\ ir Iivnovn -utvised that Mr Bennett had no intention of giving any land <br />mtLC w^^^ Mr. J-sen. Exbibi. J. and was found lo be at a 30' width. <br />Lo?2's al!l has been adjusted to exclude the area of the easement now proposed at 3.07 acres. <br />Uoth the County and the engineer recommend that Lot 2 be served by the existing driveway and curb <br />cut at the south side of the east comer ol Lot 2. <br />Both lots have been tested^^^^^ <br />niounds ^ J j , (,c removed prior to final plat approval. If applicant seeks final <br />shared applican. must execute a developer's agreement and post <br />Xer of ciSittensure the removal before building permit is issued for new construction on Lot